LumberFlow
LumberFlow helps lumber dealers find projects worth pursuing and make buying decisions that protect margin.
Radar is in Private Beta. LumberFlow Procurement is available now.
Compare LumberFlow products
Radar — Private Beta
Find the construction projects your sales team should call on next.
Explore Radar Private BetaProcurement — Available now
Turn supplier emails and quotes into buyer-approved purchasing decisions.
See ProcurementDealers run on a few points of net profit. Both of the decisions that move that number get made from information that already exists and that nobody has time to review.
Industry commentary from the NRLA puts typical lumber-dealer net profit around 4% — roughly $400,000 on $10 million in sales. Two decisions move that number: which jobs your team chases, and what you pay for the material.
The first is a margin decision, not only a volume one. NRLA reports commodity lumber typically carries a 20–25% gross margin while doors, windows, and millwork can carry 30–50%, and that high-performing yards have cut lumber from roughly 50% of revenue to roughly 30%.
Both decisions get made from information that already exists and that nobody has time to review. Radar organizes the sell-side review. Procurement organizes the buy-side one.
Radar organizes supported local building activity into a prioritized daily project queue. Reps review the signal, claim ownership, and decide the appropriate next action; Radar does not turn a permit into a guaranteed buyer.
See
One ranked daily queue
Supported local building activity arrives in one prioritized queue instead of scattered portal searches.
Claim
Visible team ownership
All, Mine, and Team views show what is open and who already owns it, so a territory does not look covered while signals sit unreviewed.
Act
A recorded next action
A rep claims a project, logs activity, nurtures it, disqualifies it, or hands it off — Radar does not automate outreach or replace sales judgment.
Project signals still need rep validation. Radar does not turn a permit into a qualified buyer.

Six procurement steps, one reviewed workflow: extract, reach, compare, time, approve, and learn.
Supplier emails and PDFs arrive with mixed species, grades, dimensions, freight terms, and lead times. Buyers lose hours turning that raw email into comparable quote data.
LumberFlow reads every supplier response, extracts species, grade, dimensions, volume, $/MBF pricing, freight terms, and notes, then keeps the original email attached for review.
Most RFQ waves stop at the contacts a buyer remembers first, even when other suppliers are a better fit for the product, lane, or timing.
The agent suggests relevant suppliers, drafts personalized RFQs and follow-ups, preserves thread context, and lets the buyer approve the outreach before it sends.
The cheapest headline $/MBF can lose once freight, lead time, SKU substitutions, and team benchmarks are included.
LumberFlow ranks every offer by delivered $/MBF, freight, lead time, SKU match, target price, and recent team benchmarks so buyers compare the real delivered economics.
A quote can look right until the market moves before the load lands. Buyers need current context at the moment they approve, not after the weekly report catches up.
Daily market analysis and weekly forecasts sit beside active RFQs so the buyer can weigh timing risk before sending a counter, award, or PO.
Automation only works for lumber teams if buyers keep control of supplier relationships, counters, awards, and purchase orders.
LumberFlow drafts RFQs, follow-ups, counters, awards, and POs. A buyer reviews and approves every action before anything leaves the system.
Pricing knowledge disappears when it lives in one buyer's inbox, a whiteboard, or a side spreadsheet no one else sees in time.
Every supplier response, quote, benchmark, and award becomes shared procurement intelligence so the next buyer starts with the team context already in place.
Modeled from email-heavy lumber sourcing workflows where buyers manually extract quotes, chase suppliers, compare market pricing, and time buys with scattered market context.
LumberFlow brings quote extraction, freight terms, team benchmarks, and market timing into one shared view so every buyer compares the quote before approving the next move.
Radar and Procurement are separate products today and do not exchange workflow data. Each can be bought on its own.
Lumber runs on two decisions — which job to chase, and what to pay for it. Both get made with worse information than they deserve.
For a decade I watched lumber buyers make six-figure inventory commitments based on a weekly pricing report and whatever they heard from a supplier yesterday. That knowledge lived in individual buyers' heads and inboxes — and walked out the door when someone left.
Then I started asking the sales side the same questions and got the same answer back. Reps knew their accounts cold, but finding the next project meant remembering it, hearing about it, or clicking through municipal permit portals nobody had time for. A territory could look covered and still have projects moving through it unseen. It was the same problem wearing different clothes: the information a dealer needs to make money already exists — it is just scattered, and nobody has time to review it.
So LumberFlow works both ends. Radar brings supported local building activity into one ranked queue so sales knows which projects to work next. Procurement captures every supplier quote, layers in daily market analysis and ML price forecasts, and turns email threads into buying intelligence the company owns instead of one inbox. They are deliberately separate products — you can buy either one. They live under one roof because they answer the same question from two directions: where does the next profitable load come from?
I'd be glad to walk you through either one personally.
No sales team, no pitch deck — just a live walkthrough. Radar or Procurement — tell me which.
10+ years inside wood products supply chain and pricing systems — I lived the problem before I built for it
Built AI that understands lumber-specific data: species, grades, dimensions, $/MBF, mill dynamics
Radar scores projects on lumber-sale logic — buy-timing, package size, and who actually purchases — not a generic B2B lead score
Designed both products so knowledge belongs to the company, not to one rep's memory or one buyer's inbox
Radar runs on supported public building-activity records, and every signal is reviewed and validated by a rep before it becomes outreach
No supplier portal. No inbox takeover. Your team keeps the relationship and gets a cleaner buying record.
Radar
Procurement
Stay ahead of price moves with weekly analysis written for procurement teams.
Straight answers on Radar project discovery, Procurement workflows, buyer approval, and supplier experience.
Radar is in Private Beta for lumber sales teams. Procurement is available now for buying teams. They are sold and used separately.