LumberFlow
Profitable work is harder to find in a flat market. LumberFlow points your sales team at the local projects worth chasing — and your buyers at what the material should really cost.
Radar is in Private Beta. LumberFlow Procurement is available now.
Compare LumberFlow products
Radar — Private Beta
Find the construction projects your sales team should call on next.
Explore Radar Private BetaProcurement — Available now
Turn supplier emails and quotes into buyer-approved purchasing decisions.
See ProcurementWhere your reps spend their prospecting hours, and what you pay for the material.
Industry commentary from the NRLA puts typical lumber-dealer net profit near 4% — about $400,000 on $10 million in sales. On that margin, a quarter spent chasing work that was never going to pay is not a slow quarter. It is the year.
Radar points your sales team at the local projects worth their hours. Procurement holds the line on what the material costs. Both work from information that already exists and that nobody has time to review.
Radar monitors local construction activity and turns it into a prioritized daily project queue, ranked by profitability potential and deal size. Your reps decide what to pursue; Radar makes sure the right projects reach them first.
See
One ranked daily queue
Local construction activity arrives already gathered and ranked by profitability potential and deal size, instead of scattered across portal searches.
Claim
Visible team ownership
All, Mine, and Team views show what is open and who owns it, so a territory is covered in fact rather than in theory.
Act
A pipeline that is tracked
Reps claim a project, log activity, and move it through deal statuses with notes — so the pipeline belongs to the company, not to one rep.
Radar does the finding and the first-pass ranking. Your reps keep the judgment and the relationship.

Six procurement steps, one reviewed workflow: extract, reach, compare, time, approve, and learn.
Supplier emails and PDFs arrive with mixed species, grades, dimensions, freight terms, and lead times. Buyers lose hours turning that raw email into comparable quote data.
LumberFlow reads every supplier response, extracts species, grade, dimensions, volume, $/MBF pricing, freight terms, and notes, then keeps the original email attached for review.
Most RFQ waves stop at the contacts a buyer remembers first, even when other suppliers are a better fit for the product, lane, or timing.
The agent suggests relevant suppliers, drafts personalized RFQs and follow-ups, preserves thread context, and lets the buyer approve the outreach before it sends.
The cheapest headline $/MBF can lose once freight, lead time, SKU substitutions, and team benchmarks are included.
LumberFlow ranks every offer by delivered $/MBF, freight, lead time, SKU match, target price, and recent team benchmarks so buyers compare the real delivered economics.
A quote can look right until the market moves before the load lands. Buyers need current context at the moment they approve, not after the weekly report catches up.
Daily market analysis and weekly forecasts sit beside active RFQs so the buyer can weigh timing risk before sending a counter, award, or PO.
Automation only works for lumber teams if buyers keep control of supplier relationships, counters, awards, and purchase orders.
LumberFlow drafts RFQs, follow-ups, counters, awards, and POs. A buyer reviews and approves every action before anything leaves the system.
Pricing knowledge disappears when it lives in one buyer's inbox, a whiteboard, or a side spreadsheet no one else sees in time.
Every supplier response, quote, benchmark, and award becomes shared procurement intelligence so the next buyer starts with the team context already in place.
Modeled from email-heavy lumber sourcing workflows where buyers manually extract quotes, chase suppliers, compare market pricing, and time buys with scattered market context.
LumberFlow brings quote extraction, freight terms, team benchmarks, and market timing into one shared view so every buyer compares the quote before approving the next move.
Radar and Procurement are separate products today and do not exchange workflow data. Each can be bought on its own.
Lumber runs on two decisions — which job to chase, and what to pay for it. Both get made with worse information than they deserve.
Reps knew their accounts cold, but finding the next project meant remembering it, hearing about it, or clicking through permit portals nobody had time for. A territory could look covered while projects moved through it unseen.
I heard the same answer on the buying side — six-figure commitments made off a weekly price report and whatever a supplier said yesterday. Same problem in different clothes: the information a dealer needs to make money already exists, scattered, with nobody free to review it. Radar works the sell side, Procurement the buy side. Buy either one.
No sales team, no pitch deck — just a live walkthrough. Radar or Procurement — tell me which.
Radar ranks projects by profitability potential and deal size, and every ranking is explainable — a rep can see why one project outranked another
10+ years inside wood products supply chain and pricing systems — I lived the problem before I built for it
Built AI that understands lumber-specific data: species, grades, dimensions, $/MBF, mill dynamics
Designed both products so knowledge belongs to the company, not to one rep's memory or one buyer's inbox
No supplier portal. No inbox takeover. Your team keeps the relationship and gets a cleaner buying record.
Radar
Procurement
Stay ahead of price moves with weekly analysis written for procurement teams.
Straight answers on Radar project discovery, Procurement workflows, buyer approval, and supplier experience.
Radar is in Private Beta for lumber sales teams. Procurement is available now for buying teams. They are sold and used separately.